×

Warning

JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 205
Constitution should not be tampered with by politicians Constitution should not be tampered with by politicians Constitution should not be tampered with by politicians

Constitution should not be tampered with by politicians

The political mayhem surrounding the presidential age-limit debate forced many people to opt out of the debate and leave the fate of the country in the hands of Members of Parliament.

However, after listening to the wisdom of some senior citizens who spoke at a workshop organised by the Elders Forum last Friday, one was forced to reflect on the current political situation in the country in which constitutional matters are being confused with political issues. A national constitution should be above politics and that is why the Constitution itself makes a distinction between the political work of Parliament and its special powers to amend the Constitution.
Article 79 of the Constitution sets out the political functions of Parliament to include:
• The power to make laws on any matter for the peace, order, development and good governance of Uganda.
• The power to confer authority on any person or body to make provisions having the force of law.
• The duty to protect the constitution and promote the democratic governance of Uganda.
In furtherance of these functions, Parliament is given power under Article 94 to make rules to regulate its procedure and Article 94(4)(b) specifically gives a Member of Parliament the right to move a private member’s Bill subject to the following limitations
• The member moving the private member’s Bill must seek assistance of the department of government whose area of operation is affected by the Bill.
• The Attorney General’s office must be involved in drafting of the Bill.
Article 259 of Chapter Eighteen of the Constitution gives special powers to Parliament to amend the Constitution. These powers are separate from the political powers, which are bestowed on Parliament.
Accordingly, the rules governing the procedure to enact laws cannot be used for purposes of amending the Constitution. Indeed Article 259 provides that ‘Parliament may amend any provision of the Constitution according to procedure laid down in this chapter’, meaning Chapter Eighteen and not Chapter Five.

The only way the Constitution can be amended is by first and foremost enacting a law implementing the provision of Chapter Eighteen and making rules under that law providing for procedure for such amendment. The Bill before Parliament was introduced by a private member according to rules, which govern the political work of Parliament, which makes it unconstitutional.
Secondly, even if the current rules of parliamentary procedure were considered to be applicable, the preparation of the Bill would still render it unconstitutional because it was not done according to the requirements of the Constitution.

Article 94(c) and (d) require that the member moving the Bill should have sought the assistance of the Ministry of Constitutional Affairs as the department of government most affected by the Bill as well as the professional assistance of the office of the Attorney General should have been sought in its drafting.

These provisions are important and are in line with the idea that the Constitution should not be capriciously and indiscriminately tampered with by politicians.
Lastly a bill to amend the constitution can only be assented to by the President if it is accompanied by a certificate of the Speaker that the provisions of chapter eighteen have been complied with in relation to it.

This chapter does not confer on a private member the right to move a bill to amend the constitution. As such Hon.Raphel Magyezi’s bill is irregularly and unconstitutionally before august house.
The political and constitutional confusion caused by Hon. Magyezi’s bill can only be sorted out through sober dialogue and the willingness to accept wise counsel.

 

Credit: Peter Mulira

Daily Monitor Uganda

About Author

Related items

  • Museveni’s long march in power

    As the debate on Raphael Magyezi’s bill to amend Article 102(b) rages, BAKER BATTE LULE looks back at the journey President Museveni has walked to where he is now.

    Some pundits refer to his 31 years in power as a life presidency project. That from the outset, Museveni was never going to let go of the presidency.

    The carrot and stick have been applied at different points to overcome obstacles to this alleged project.

    We start with the first four years after the NRM/A shot its way into office in 1986 when the new government issued Legal Notice No. 1. The notice decreed that the interim government would be in place for only four years, following which a general election would be called in 1989.

    However, in the same year, President Museveni, who was the chairman of the NRA [now UPDF] and National Resistance Council [now parliament], shifted.

    He told his then minister of Justice and attorney general, George Wilson Kanyeihamba, to draft justifications for the extension of the NRC and its executive arm for another five years until a new constitution under which general elections would be held had been written.

    Kanyeihamba, now a retired Supreme court judge, told The Observer recently that there were justifiable reasons for the extension of Museveni’s tenure then. But these reasons no longer exist today, Kanyeihamba says.

    “When the Movement came, they had given themselves four years but that was idealistic. Museveni entrusted me to articulate the views why the NRM should extend for another five years. I did; you don’t have to believe my word, go to the NRM secretariat [and check what I said],” Kanyeihamba said.

    Today, the retired judge finds himself vehemently opposed to his former boss’ determination to lift age limits from the constitution and remove the last thing standing in the way of a potential presidency for life. Kanyeihamba says the issues which necessitated extending Museveni’s tenure 28 years ago have long disappeared.

    “For the president who has served the country for over 30 years making decisions day and night; he is physically and mentally exhausted...,” he said.

    In the then expanded National Resistance Council of 270 members, only one member, Joseph Wasswa Ziritwawula opposed the 1989 extension. He famously walked out, resigning his seat as NRC member representing a Kampala constituency.

    Ziritwawula has long retreated from active politics. However, in an interview with a local daily, the former Kampala mayoral candidate said he would still resign if the same situation played out now.

    “Proclamation No. 1 of 1986, put it that the government would be in power for four years after which they would hold elections. Which they didn’t do,” Ziritwawula said.

    “I was saying that parliament (NRC) could not extend its term. It is like parliament sitting today and deciding to extend its term. That is not its mandate; it’s the mandate of the people. Giving a period for government is a mandate of the whole population; not a mandate of parliament,” he said.

    LIFTING OF TERM LIMITS

    The NRC later approved the Uganda Constitutional Commission headed by former Chief Justice Benjamin Odoki to collect people’s views about the new constitution which was debated and promulgated by the Constituent Assembly in 1995. In there, it had article 105 (b) limiting a person eligible for election as president to two five-year terms.

    In the subsequent elections of 1996, a still popular President Museveni defeated his closest rival, the opposition coalition candidate, Paul Kawanga Ssemogerere by 75 percent.

    Five years on in 2001, he returned to the people with an election manifesto built around the need to professionalise the armed forces ahead of the transition to full civilian rule.

    Credit: The Observer Newspaper.

     

  • Ethiopian Airlines to partner tour firms

    Ethiopian Airlines is looking for tour and travel companies to partner in order to boost regional tourism and trade between Uganda and Ethiopia.

    Abebe Angessa, the country manager for Ethiopian Airlines in Uganda, said Uganda’s trade and tourism ties with Ethiopia have been the largest contributor to their business, and it is time the airline invested more to strengthen the relationship between the two countries.

    According to Angessa, promotion of tourism has been minimal as the concentration has been placed on trade and other travels.

    “Ethiopians have a lot of disposable income and the country has many historical sites, which Ugandans can visit. The same applies to Uganda where we have a lot of fauna and flora; we are looking for people to work with on this.”

    Angessa said: “We have developed special packages for holiday makers. We are ready to enter partnerships with designated tour and travel operators and ticketing agents to exploit this tourism potential.”

    Angessa who was addressing the airlines travel agents in Kampala further said if need be, the number of flights from Entebbe to Addis Ababa will increase from three to five every day.

    Angessa said tourists can visit special sites such as the place where the biblical covenant is kept, the Nagashi mosque, ancient buildings and churches of the 12th century.

    “The sights, the scenery, the culture are already there. Ethiopia’s ancient Orthodox Christianity has gifted the nation with thousands of churches and monasteries,” he said.

    Credit. The Observer Uganda

  • Prospective recruits bribing their way into UPDF

    Prospecting recruits who want to join the army, the Uganda People's Defence Forces are reportedly making attempts to bribe their way so as to beat and compromise the recruitment exercise.

    Col. James Nambale, the in-charge of the recruitment exercise which started at Kololo Independence Grounds in Kampala yesterday, said that they have intercepted a number of people who were offering bribes to officers so that they can be let into the army without facing the regular recruitment process.

    He said that he personally resisted bribes ranging between Shs 100,000 to Shs 500,000 offered openly by several potential recruits. Others, according to Nambale, were offering bribes in form of airtime and transport, expecting favouritism in return during the recruitment.

    "There are those who even have corrupted their ways to come here. I have been called by 26 people. There are those who have [offered] me airtime, there are those who have asked me to get something 'small' for transport. I’ve been well facilitated with my team here.

    I ate well and slept in Sheraton [hotel] last night. Please, you're desperate for a job and you want to give Col Nambale Shs 500, 000, Shs 200,000, Shs 100,000. You’re killing the army, you’re killing the country, you’re not coming to do anything. I can’t take that money. If you can give me Shs 100,000, Shs 500,000 to recruit you because possibly you’re my brother, one will give me Shs 1 billion and I kill my president. So here it is about commitment to your country, it is about guarding others while they sleep", said Col Nambale. 

    Col Nambale advised the prospective recruits to identify army officers they have given bribes to help them go through the recruitment process saying that these will not have much to do for them.

    "If you gave anybody money please raise your hand now and we get your money from them. We’ve always had incidents where people say they took our money. You may be my brother, you may be my son, you may be my relative.

    We may have gone to school together with you but when you come here and I favour you because of that [yet] you can’t meet the criteria, am telling you; you will not be near me when you’re facing ‘music’ on the front line….Even if you’re my brother, please come here and meet the criteria of joining the Uganda People’s Defence Forces", Nambale added. 

    Nambale further cautioned the prospective recruits against looking at joining the army as a means of getting employment saying that the army is about commitment to the good of the country.

    "There are problems when you people join the army because you’re desperate for a jobs. Some of you are looking at becoming officers like I. I have soldiered on for more than have of my life to reach where I am….There are those of who are you joining just to look for jobs. Am telling you, the money you’re looking for is not in the army, you can go to parliament, you will get the money but inhere it is about working, it’s about commitment to your country..."

    As the screening of the recruits went on, URN observed a number of parents and guardians both ordinary people and army officers following up on their children at the different stages of screening in a bid to beat the process.

    At some point, the recruitment officers were seen struggling to push aside these parents in vain. Maj. Edward Birungi, the spokesperson of UPDF Lands Forces confirmed this difficulty.

    "Parents who are here are also really interested in their children joining the army. They are close to them and are making it very difficult, we say give us space but they really don’t want to give us space. So they are making the exercise really difficult. However in liaison with the military police which is on the ground, we’re on the ground. We expect the exercise to get on well", Birungi said.

    URN also observed a UPDF officer who was not part of the official recruitment team helping some of the parents and some army officers sneak people who were disqualified at the physical checkup stage into the qualified team.

    Both teams were seated close to each other. This UPDF officer was later seen congratulating parents, possibly for a mission accomplished.

    However, UPDF spokesperson Brig. Richard Karemire noted that there are safeguards against infiltration and that persons who cheated at the entry point would still be eliminated. He said that they do not expect any traits of corruption in the process.

    "We’ve embedded in the teams other officers from other arms that support the process. We have our guys from the intelligence office, we’ve political commissars, so it is really an all round team which is doing a good job so far. We don’t expect any traits of corruption, for us in UPDF we exercise zero tolerance to corruption", Karemire said.

    Asked whether they have an auditing system to look at the work done by the recruitment officers, Karemire said that they have an inbuilt mechanism to access whatever goes on everyday.

    The nationwide recruitment exercise looks at recruiting 4,000 soldiers of whom 3,000 will be regular and 1,000 will be professional to serve the different professional arms in the army. The exercise will end on October 29, in 116 districts of Uganda.

    Kampala district was given only 600 slots in the recruitment exercise. However, Deborah Mbabazi the Kampala Resident City Commissioner (RCC) says that less than 100 regular prospective recruits out of thousands that converged at Kololo were from the five divisions of Kampala.

    The regular prospective recruits are required to have a minimum qualification of the O'level (UCE) while the prospective professional recruits are required to have a minimum qualification of the A'level (UACE) obtained in the last three years. These should also have a bias in science subjects.

    The recruits are further required to be citizens, present a medical examination report, national identity cards, local council recommendation letter, and original copies of their academic papers, three passport size photos among others before being taken through the other physical and medical tests by the recruitment team. They are also supposed to be single with no children.

    The UPDF recruitment exercise seeks to address the human resource deficit arising out of the retirement of a similar number of personnel who will be leaving the forces over the next two years. Up to 1700 of these will be retiring in November this year.

    Credit: The Observer Uganda

Login to post comments